Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 29, 2018, at around 01:50, the Defendant 112 reported on the roads in front of Seogu Daegu, Seo-gu, Daegu, Daegu, the Defendant spits spit in once on the face of D in the course where he is recommended to invalid from D from the surrounding circumstances belonging to the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, Police Station C District, which was called to the site, and D spits.
“Along on the face of the left-hand-hand-hand side of the D,” the reflect of the defect, and assaulted at one time by drinking.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;
1. The crime of obstructing the legitimate execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is deemed to be bad in the nature of the crime. Meanwhile, the defendant recognized his mistake and made an agreement with the police officer not to repeat the crime, the fact that the police officer did not have any criminal record of the crime of obstructing the execution of official duties (the police officer want not to punish the defendant, and the defendant wanted his wife), the fact that there is no criminal record of the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, the fact that the crime is contingent, the degree of damage, the circumstances of the crime, the degree of