Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 10, 2017, the Defendant 23:43 around 23:43, 2017, when the police officer belonging to the Daegu Dong-gu Police Station D District, who was called to the site upon receiving a report that a drunk person avoided a disturbance, requested the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, the Defendant she spited the mobile phone used in his/her own hand toward the face of the above E, and displayed drinking, and the police officer F saw the Defendant, and the Defendant arrested him/her as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with the performance of official duties.
After notification, spits, spits, etc. were assaulted on the face of defective E in the act of committing a crime.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reports.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being in the period of suspension of execution; (b) the Defendant reflects the Defendant; (c) the Defendant did not have the same criminal record; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence as ordered shall be determined in light of the sentencing