1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a public official of class 9 on December 10, 1982, and transferred to the Ministry of Employment and Labor on September 25, 1987. From February 27, 2015, the Plaintiff served as an administrative assistant (Grade 6) at the Bupyeong-gu Regional Employment and Labor Agency B and customer support room.

B. On March 30, 2016, the Plaintiff was indicted for the following facts charged.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant released the Plaintiff from office (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to Article 73-3(1)4 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that he/she was prosecuted as a criminal case. On October 24, 2016, the Minister of Employment and Labor imposed a disciplinary measure of KRW 2 million on the Plaintiff on grounds of disciplinary reasons, such as violation of the duty of integrity as stated in the following facts charged, violation of the duty of good faith, good faith, fairness and duty to maintain dignity, etc.

On December 7, 2012, the Plaintiff received 1 million won from E to receive a bribe in relation to his/her duties, and received 1 million won in cash from E on January 4, 2013. The Plaintiff received 1,000,000 won and received a bribe in relation to his/her duties. The Plaintiff received 1,00,000 won in cash, which was provided to the effect that he/she is able to receive convenience from E, from E, and received a bribe in relation to his/her duties.

② On October 20, 2014, when the Plaintiff was working in the office F of the Bupyeong-gu Regional Employment and Labor Office, the Plaintiff visited the U.S.T., a workplace within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Labor, to submit documents, such as a contract for dispatch, and to verify whether the illegality of the dispatch of illegal workers was found. On October 28, 2014, the Plaintiff sent a written corrective order to the said company to suspend transactions with the illegal contracting company at its own discretion, and then, on November 3, 2014, offered convenience from the employees of the said company in regulating or taking administrative dispositions related to the violation of the Labor Standards Act and other Labor Relations Act.