Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an operator of C (one-person D) with the second floor in the North Chang Chang-gun and the second floor in North Korea.

No person shall be allowed to engage in massage for profit without obtaining a qualification as a inseminator accredited by the Mayor/Do Governor.

Nevertheless, from August 2017 to April 2018, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 won for each customer, 120,000 won for each customer, 160,000 won for the name of a telegraphama, a telegraphama, a father-math, and a bridge, and 220,000 won for a telegraphama, a telegraphama, and a telegraphama and a telegraphama, and 220,00 won for customers’ arms and legs.

Accordingly, the defendant did not obtain the recognition of the Marine's qualification, and was Marine for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecution examination protocol of the accused;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Response to a request for information, reply to a warrant of search, seizure and verification, provision of financial information by a warrant of search, seizure and verification, reply to the details of chain store transactions, reply to a warrant of search, seizure and verification, and reply to a request for

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (as to photographing and attaching copies of seized articles, and as to the criminal facts A of the suspect, specific period);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 88 subparagraph 3 and 82 (1) of the Medical Service Act for the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2000,000 won for a fine for the same crime in 2017) provides that the defendant has received a summary order for the same crime in Article 334(1) [Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Apr. 4, 2018) [Article 334(1) of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Apr. 3, 2018). However, there is insufficient evidence to deem that each seized article