logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.06.28 2018고정211
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant A is the representative director of the corporation B established for the purpose of trucking transportation business in Asan CityD.

No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

A. The Defendant, a private-use truck registered as owned by B, owns five cargo vehicles of F, G, H, I, and J, a private-use truck, and entered into a commercial transport contract with E, a business partner, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and transported the automobile parts for a fee by using the above cargo vehicles, which amounting to KRW 9,076, total operating frequency from around 2013 to 2017, to KRW 706,465,400.

B. The Defendant, a private-use truck registered as B owned by K Co., Ltd., owns two cargo trucks, and entered into a commercial transport contract with K Co., Ltd., which is a business partner, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and carried out a commercial transport contract with K Co., Ltd., which is a business partner, with a total sum of 34 times from around 2016 to around 2017, with a total of 57,428,200 won, using the above cargo vehicle to transport the automobile parts for compensation.

2. A, the representative director of the B Defendant, committed the same act as that of the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. A written accusation and a certificate of full registered matters;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Details of each comprehensive vehicle tax;

1. Response materials (E), K reply materials, the number of times of annual transportation by year, expenses for payment, the current status of vehicles and articles;

1. Current status of commercial trucking transport for private use owned by the stock company B;

1. Application of each motor vehicle registration certificate statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 67 Subparag. 7 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, and the selection of fines;

B. Defendant B:

arrow