Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. At around 15:00 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) the victim, etc. thought that D, E, and victim F, (g) in C Park Park in the Kimcheon-si B building complex, was playing the Defendant’s daughter G with “Ildo” on the Defendant’s father G; (c) the victim, etc. was able to live with the Defendant’s daughter who delayed development; (d) the victim’s breath was flick and flicked one time; (e) the victim’s flick and flicked down on the floor; and (e) the victim was flicked on two occasions by pushing the victim.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the prosecution, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.