The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 9, 2013, the Defendant was a neighboring resident of the “D” factory in Kimcheon-si, and around May 19, 2013, the Defendant found the Defendant’s house room in Kimcheon-si, and found the Defendant’s house room in Kimcheon-si, and found the factory. However, the Defendant confirmed that the postponed site was not a factory, but discovered that a large amount of dust was generated at the site where the product was distributed to the factory.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while shooting the above work site in his possession, heard from the victim F (the age of 65) who was the factory security guard to the word "to remove and return the photographs", and assaulted the victim's flab.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the prosecution, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.