logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.10 2016고단3712
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

B. The execution of the above sentence for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On March 26, 2015, the Daejeon District Court was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and was released from Daejeon Prison on November 30, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 21, 2016.

Defendant

B is a person who operates a game hall with the trade name of “H” in the Dong-dong War Zone G, and the Defendant C is an employee of the above game hall, and the Defendant A is an exchange prize in which game points are exchanged in the above game site.

1. No one shall engage in business of converting into money or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results (referring to points, premiums, and virtual currency used in a game, such as game money and others similar thereto) obtained through the use of game water by a defendant A;

Nevertheless, at around 17:30 on May 23, 2016, the Defendant exchanged 9,000 points per 10,000 points after the Defendant obtained a game by using a game machine “piracy and a dance” installed in the said game room by customers, or deducted the remaining game points from 10% fees, in the smoking room in the said H game room.

2. A water-related business entity of a criminal defendant B or C shall not allow him/her to gamble or perform other speculative acts by using game water, or leave him/her to do so.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to introduce the said A to the customers demanding the exchange at the time, place, and place stated in paragraph 1, and Defendant C did not take any measures despite being aware of the fact that the said game was being conducted in the said game.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of inquiry about criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and A: Article 44 of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

arrow