The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A 22,347,98 won, 1,990,309 won, and each of the above amounts to the plaintiff B from January 21, 2020.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 28, 2006, the head of Ulsan Jung-gu Office publicly announced the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor D on August 28, 2006, the head of Ulsan Jung-gu publicly announced the residents' perusal of the residents in the area designated as the rearrangement zone C (hereinafter "improvement zone in this case"). The Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor designated the improvement zone on August 23, 2007.

B. The Defendant is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership that implements a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project implemented in the instant rearrangement zone (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”). On November 10, 201, the Defendant obtained authorization for the establishment of an association from the head of Ulsan-gu Office on January 11, 201, and obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on January 11, 201, and on the same day, the said authorization was publicly notified as Ulsan Metropolitan City F.

(c)

Plaintiff

A owned the 3rd floor H of the Ulsan-gu G Building located in the instant improvement zone (exclusive ownership 72.0135 square meters; hereinafter “one house of this case”) from August 28, 2006, which was the date of public announcement for public inspection of the designation of the improvement zone of this case, and became a person who was liquidated in cash because he did not file an application for parcelling-out with the Defendant for parcelling-out, and was residing in the said housing by May 3, 2019, which was the date of the ruling for expropriation, on December 10, 2018.

(d)

Plaintiff

B owned the Ulsan-gu I Building Jho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (exclusive ownership 110.5 square meters, hereinafter “instant two houses”) within the instant improvement zone from June 25, 2014, and became a person subject to cash liquidation because he/she failed to file an application for parcelling-out to the Defendant, and was residing in the said housing from May 21, 2015 to December 3, 2018, which was the date of the adjudication on expropriation, from May 21, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including various numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The attachment to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows;

3. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. There is no dispute between the parties that, as the owner of a residential building in the instant improvement zone, the Plaintiff A constitutes a person eligible for resettlement funds, relocation expenses, and compensation for private expenses.

(b) it;