1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff shall repay the debt (quasi-loan) No. 20072, 2003.

1. Basic facts

A. D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E Co., Ltd.”) was changed to E Co., Ltd on the ground of the real estate purchased by the Plaintiff on June 16, 2001.

(D) In total, “D” before, after, and after, the change

) From February 1999, the F apartment 3 and 70 households (hereinafter referred to as the “instant sectioned”).

2) The construction project newly constructed (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction project”)

(2) On October 9, 2001, G, the father of the Defendant, entered into a partnership agreement with D on October 9, 2001, and invested an amount equivalent to KRW 270 million in the instant construction, but the Corporation was not a progress. As such, on October 16, 2002, Daejeon District Court 2002Kahap1075 decided that D shall not take procedures for changing the name of the project undertaker regarding the instant apartment construction project plan.

On February 10, 2003, G received from D a written waiver of the project owner of the instant construction project, and on July 23, 2003, Daejeon District Court 2003Kahap725 decided to suspend and continue the instant construction project.

3) The D representative director H asked that G be able to obtain approval for sale and loan without changing the project undertaker with respect to the instant construction project into a new corporation, and that it is not possible to obtain approval for sale and loan. Accordingly, G loaned KRW 16 million to D, and around September 22, 2003, G set up a letter of agreement between D representative director H and D to settle the claims against G, including the amount of investment and various application for provisional disposition, the cost of establishing a new corporation, and the cost of establishing a new corporation, with the settlement of the claims against D by October 30, 2003. G around that time, G is mutually changed to J corporation (J corporation on June 19, 2004, hereinafter referred to as “J”).

4) Then, G had a lot of land price to the Plaintiff on October 2003, since G had a lot of land price when the Plaintiff performed construction works after acquiring J., and it had a lot of land price to D.