logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.16 2014나2052009
구상금
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the rehabilitation debtor's crew construction industry, which is the litigation taking-off of the Plaintiff's crew construction industry.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties to the Korea National Housing Corporation (the Plaintiff was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009, and the Plaintiff comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea National Housing Corporation; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the 1,070 household unit A apartment complex A (hereinafter referred to as the “the apartment complex of this case”) in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu.

B. Conclusion of a contract for the construction of the apartment of this case 1) Members Construction Industry Co., Ltd. (mutually: members unemployment Co., Ltd. at the time, hereinafter “large Construction”).

(3) On October 11, 2004, Gyeongnam Construction Co., Ltd. (Seo Construction Co., Ltd.) was merged into Gyeongnam Construction Co., Ltd.

(1) The merger shall be referred to as 'Seoul' in total as 'Seoul';

On November 26, 1998, 432 households out of the apartment of this case between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant Section 1 apartment”).

A) A contract for construction works was entered into with respect to Defendant Gyeongdo Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Gyeongdo”).

(2) On November 24, 1998, Samdo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cable Construction”) concluded a construction contract with the Plaintiff with respect to the construction works of the remaining 638 households (hereinafter “638 households among the instant apartment buildings”) excluding the above 432 households among the instant apartment buildings (hereinafter “Table Construction”), which had been constructed by Samdo Construction among the instant apartment buildings.

(hereinafter referred to as the “each of the instant construction contracts” in total, including the construction contract for, and the construction contract for, the construction project between, and the Plaintiff.

The defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association, which entered into a warranty contract for the defects of the defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association, shall construct its members and construct its members, and establish its members and Gyeongnam Enterprises, with respect to the defects arising from the apartment units of the Section 1.

arrow