1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 18, 191, the Plaintiff was appointed as a fire-fighting officer of Seoul Special Metropolitan City from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018, and served as the chief of a fire station from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018.

[Grounds for disciplinary action] During the work as the chief of B/L, the policy official expenses cannot be used for the purpose other than the purpose stipulated in the expenditure budget in executing the budget, but have been falsely registered and disbursed as an expenditure to the public office of work. However, in fact, the party officer meeting expenses should have been paid with the membership fees of the B/L meeting, after paying a part of the expenses to be paid with the membership fees of the B/L meeting, and then cashing 5,460,000 won over 16 times in total through the method of returning the expenses from the membership fees of the executive meeting, and using a total of 44,88,000 won for the management of personal goods such as the personnel encouragement expenses, etc. for the public purpose of the

This act may not be used for any purpose other than the original purpose in accordance with Article 47 of the Local Finance Act and the Code of Conduct for Public Officials of Seoul, as well as securing convenience in using the budget for any purpose other than the original purpose, and disturbing the accounting order. The decision on heavy disciplinary action is made in violation of Article 69 (1) 1 and 2 of the Local Public Officials Act by holding the responsibility as the subject of improper execution and use of the policy operating expenses and violating Article 48 (1)

B. On October 10, 2018, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Fire Officers Disciplinary Committee decided that the Plaintiff violated Article 48 (Duty of Fidelity) of the Local Public Officials Act, and decided that the Plaintiff was demoted on the 15th day of the same month pursuant to Article 69 (1) 1 and 2 of the Local Public Officials Act.

C. The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the foregoing demotion, filed an appeal review, and the Seoul Metropolitan Government Local Appeals Review Committee was first on January 17, 2019.