1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid below is revoked.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a person who provides a rent service to the customers visiting the instant charging station using the automatic renter while operating the “DPG filling station” in the nuclear power plant in the nuclear power plant in the nuclear power plant.

(2) around 09:40 on October 20, 2012, Defendant B visited the instant charging station in order to set off the Epis car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); according to the Plaintiff’s employee F’s guidance, Defendant B entered the instant parking machine owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant parking machine”).

(3) While the vehicle of this case is underway with the vehicle of this case, the vehicle of this case entered the vehicle of this case with a speed higher than normal running speed and conflict with the vehicle of this case. The plaintiff spent 14,256,000 won at the repair cost of the vehicle of this case.

(4) Defendant Han Lan Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is a company that entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with Defendant B with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without any dispute, Gap's 1, 3, 4, 5, and Eul's 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The Plaintiff’s employees F notified Defendant B of all of the detailed directions for the trial, confirmed that the change speed of the instant vehicle was located in the parking guide (P) and operated the instant detailed vehicle. The instant accident occurred due to the fact that Defendant B replaced the three-way change of the three-way change speed to the main driving guide (D), the Defendants are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred to the Plaintiff.

(2) On the other hand, even if F had a sudden driving of the instant vehicle around the time when F operated the instant vehicle, the instant accident occurred due to the negligence of Defendant B caused the instant vehicle to be driven by the instant vehicle by following the accelerator while undergoing the instant accelerator by negligence. Therefore, the Defendants still are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the Plaintiff’s damage.

C. Determination No. 2-1, A.