Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On January 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the support for Suwon-Namon, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 7, 2014.
【Criminal Facts】
On May 29, 2014, around 06:15, the Defendant entered the “E entertainment tavern” located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government operated by the Victim C, and committed as if he would pay the drinking value, and issued an order to the employee F for alcohol and alcohol and got female friendship.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he received an order of alcoholic beverage and alcohol.
The Defendant received from F an amount equivalent to 3.10,00 won, such as the two weeks of Scar and the two weeks of inside.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving F.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;
1. Receipt for singing stores;
1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, US records and results of confirmation, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the status of personal identification and personal identification;
1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;
1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders is a crime by which the Defendant, without the intent and ability to pay the price, has acquired the alcohol and the speech, etc., and the Defendant committed the same type of crime during the period of repeated crime immediately after release despite the fact that he/she was punished several times as punishment or a fine, in addition to punishment by the same type of crime, even though he/she had been punished several times due to the same crime, and the damage has not been recovered (However, the Defendant cannot grasp the identity of the victim), and that the Defendant escaped while
On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and divided, and that the amount of damage is not significant, and that the number of crimes is one time is favorable to the defendant.
In addition, the circumstances leading the defendant to the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstances of the crime, the result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.