Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above defendants is against the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner operating a commercial sex trafficking business with the trade name "D" in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office 207, 501, and 1403. Defendant B is the head of the above business, and Co-defendant E is an employee of the above business.

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant A, from April 2013 to the same year.

7. Until October, 198, Defendant B was employed as female employees by operating a commercial sex business establishment with bed and maths, maths, etc. in each of the above officetels, and Defendant B was operated as the head of the business office, E, F, G, etc.

Accordingly, Defendant B from May 17, 2013 to the same year

7. By October, 100,000 won of the price of sexual traffic received 50,000 won among the price of sexual traffic by guiding the female employees to keep sexual traffic in accordance with the telephone reservation from the customers, thereby inducing them to scam the sexual organ of the customers as their hand and scam the same in a scam and scam below and below.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against E, F, H, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports and field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more;