Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president who operates the D Hanwon in Daegu Suwon-gu C building 302.

In the case of patients suffering from traffic accidents, the Defendant used the fact that the insurance company pays insurance money without accurately verifying the details of medical treatment for patients, and used the false content of medical treatment for the purpose of receiving insurance money by claiming false insurance money from the insurance company.

On April 6, 2010, the Defendant provided medical treatment to E with a traffic accident that was caused by the traffic accident at the above level, and the fact that the Defendant provided medical treatment to E is satisfying, investment law intrusion, oral-indirect, satisfying, satisfying, hot air conditioners, hot air conditioners, and drillings

The treatment of law was provided once every time and twice every time.

Nevertheless, on May 2010, the Defendant applied for insurance money to the victim Hyundai Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. through the Review and Assessment Service after entering the content of the medical treatment in the consent reporting program while claiming the payment of insurance money for the above E in the first instance room of Korea on May 2010. In the process of claiming expenses to the victim Hyundai Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., the Defendant entered the number of medical treatment for the above E into 6 to 6 to 8 times with the implementation of each medical treatment for the above E, and falsely entered the same into the victim’s company.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim company, received KRW 164,050 from the victim company a false claim on or around June 24, 2010, and from around that time to June 17, 2015, claimed insurance proceeds by means of inputting false details of treatment after treating 98 patients, such as the list of crimes, and received total KRW 46,216,334 from the seven insurance companies for 98 times in total.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.