The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On August 4, 2013, at around 05:40 on August 4, 2013, the Defendant was present at the Northern Police Station, and made a false statement to the effect that “C was raped by Defendant C” was made to the effect that C was punished by criminal punishment. On the same day, around 06:45, at the former Southern Police Agency’s Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency’s statement recording room for female school violence victims, and at the former Southern Police Agency’s statement recording room, at around 03:35, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer D of the original Ba Support Center to the effect that “C was off and raped by Defendant C, from among those who were in the same way as C, who was s, he was imped with clothes at KRW 00,000,00,” and that “C was punished.”

However, in fact C was only sexual intercourse with the permission of the defendant and did not assault or threaten the defendant or have sexual intercourse against the defendant's will.

Nevertheless, on August 4, 2013, the Defendant made a false report and made a false statement to the police officer who was unable to know the name of the police officer belonging to the Macheon Police Station North Korea, and to the police officer D belonging to the Haak-Stop Support Center of the Hacheon Police Station, thereby making a false statement of damage C.

B. On June 30, 2010, the Defendant drafted a false statement of the accusation against E in the old police station for the purpose of having E be subject to criminal punishment. The Defendant drafted a false statement of the accusation against E in the form of a criminal complaint kept in the body.

The purport of the complaint is that the defendant defendant E, who was the defendant, was forced to use her spar, was placed on the bed, was placed on the bed, was placed on the part of the defendant, was her shouldered, and the defendant was her shouldered by her two descendants, and was her indecent act by force. However, there was no fact that E had committed the above act.

Nevertheless, on June 30, 2010, the defendant submitted a written complaint to a police officer who is unable to know his/her name at the public service center of the old police station and submitted it to the police officer E.

2. Determination

A. This part of the facts charged is consistent with the judgment on non-acceptance C.