beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for one year and four months, respectively.
Defendant 1 through 9 of seized evidence.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Persons whose name is unknown, D, etc., and the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China").
In addition, the call center is established, and the telephone incentiveer assumes the phone call from the data server in which personal information such as contact information is stored, thereby leading the victims to enter personal information such as the account number, etc. at the Internet site of the false public prosecutor's office, and then transfer the money deposited in the account of the victims to the so-called one-called one-called one-called one-called one-called one-called one-called one-called one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one (hereinafter
The crime was planned.
A person whose name of operating the call center in accordance with the above crime plan is not known shall transfer the money deposited in the account under the name of the victims to the account of the head of the Tong. D shall be a person in charge of the management of the team to withdraw the call crime and shall pay a fee to the person who opened the Tong to withdraw the purchase of the shares.
By means of doing so, it was intended to collect the amount of damage by withdrawing the amount of damage to the operator of the call center, such as recruiting the amount of damage to deliver the amount of damage withdrawn by the name of the one of the one of the one of the one.
Meanwhile, Defendant A was proposed to offer KRW 300,00,00 per cash withdrawal from the above D on January 201, 2016 to KRW 400,00 per each case. Defendant A as the team leader of the 1st team that withdrawn from the crime of Bosing the Bosing, pursuant to the above D’s order, sent the amount of damage deposited to the above D’s account after photographing the person who opened the Bosing passbook, and then transmitting the amount of damage deposited to the above D’s account. Defendant B, among January 2016, proposed to offer KRW 300,000 per cash withdrawal from Defendant A from Defendant on the ground that Defendant B would offer KRW 20,000 per case of cash withdrawal from Defendant B on the site of withdrawing the amount of damage by the person who opened the Bosing passbook, and see e.g., monitoring the escape of the head of the Tong at the investigation agency and the control of the person who opened the investigation agency.