Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of Corporation B located in Gwangju Mine-gu, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing synthetic resin ( Polypathty) for agriculture and industry.

1. A person who intends to build or repair a building outside an urban area shall obtain permission from the Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;

Nevertheless, the Defendant posted a wall and a roof of 160 square meters of the front 248 square meters and the front 160 square meters of the above factory at a company B located in Pyeongtaek-gun, a general industrial area, from the beginning of the beginning of March 2016 to the end of the same month, without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency, and illegally extended the total floor area of 849 square meters by connecting a 1-dong factory with a steel frame of 357 square meters and 84 square meters inside the 357 square meters of a factory and 3-dong factory with a double-story structure.

2. The Defendant Company B, a representative of the Defendant, illegally extended the total floor area of 849 square meters to the Defendant’s 1 Dong and 3 Dong in relation to the Defendant’s business as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one copy (including drawings of current status) of the building permit processing notice, business trip result report, and building ledger;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 110 Subparag. 1 and 11(1) of the former Building Act (Amended by Act No. 14016, Feb. 3, 2016; hereinafter “former Building Act”); the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Articles 112(3) main text, 110 subparag. 1, and 11(1) of the former Building Act (hereinafter “former Building Act”), 112 subparag. 1, and 11(1) [the Defendants, despite the fact that Defendant A installed a steel plate on the steel 1 and 3 inside the factory building and 1 and 3, this cannot be deemed as an extension under the Building Act on the ground that it merely offers a steel plate. However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, Defendant A is a factory.