logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.23 2013가합75361
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part concerning the claim for deletion of article among the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2.(a)

Defendant C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 6, 2013, the Plaintiff is a person who was in K from March 2013, and C (hereinafter “C”) is a company that publishes daily newspaper “G” and C was filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures with Seoul Central District Court 2013 Ma142. The said court appointed D as a custodian when it rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures on September 6, 2013;

Defendant B is an online newspaper company established by Defendant C, which operates online newspaper I(J), and Defendant E is a director of the Social Department of C, Defendant F is a reporter of the Social Department of C, and each of the following articles.

B. On October 4, 2013, C filed suspicion that, under the title “L” and the title “M”, the Defendants received gift certificates in an amount of KRW 15 million from the H Group, which had known that they were subject to investigation into sexual traffic at the time of the Defendants’ employment as a chief prosecutor.

Since then, A was charged with the case of "N" where there was controversy over an improper investigation, and then A indicted a member of the O who disclosed the list of the prosecutor's "flodial rice price" received from H, and the prosecutor disposed of the list without suspicion.

According to the relevant person of the 3-day multiple assessment authorities, A investigated the "high-class sexual traffic" case in which the executive officers of the H Group Rescue Center at P Time of P in 1999 were involved.

H 직원에 대해선 무혐의로 종결됐고, 이후 H 측이 A에게 검사 1인당 300만 원씩 총 1,500만 원 상당의 상품권을 건넸다는 게 이들 관계자의 말이다.

Q lawyer from the H Group Restructuring Headquarters expressed that this suspicion is "the fact".

At the time, the investigative prosecutor was unaware of it or did not know about it later.

Q lawyer stated that Qu lawyer "(A) is not aware that he or she has been married, but later, he or she "(a) has been mixed."

It is expected that a considerable strike will be made if the suspicion is true.

A is a prosecutor and H's side which is classified as "X inspection".

arrow