logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.06.27 2018가합110043
정정보도 및 손해배상
Text

1. Part of the instant lawsuit pertaining to the claim for the corrective report under the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff, who is the believers of the D church, is in charge of the chairman of the church reform council, who objects to the E pastor who established the said church.

B. On May 4, 2018, the Pyeongtaekdo Federation supported E companies, asserted that the Plaintiff had suspicions, such as running a sexual traffic business establishment, while in office as the president, around 2004, when the Plaintiff was in office as the president, and distributed the news report materials.

C. On May 5, 2018, the Internet newspaper's publisher, the defendant, the editor, presented an article (attached Form 2; hereinafter "the article of this case") stating that the plaintiff had engaged in sexual traffic business as the title of "H" on the Internet journal (C) on May 5, 2018, and that "the plaintiff was engaged in sexual traffic-related business," and around 2004, he testified that the human rights movement engaged in human rights protection activities of Russian women, and that he had engaged in sexual traffic business at the J hotel with the face cover cover of I around 2005. In full view, the plaintiff published an article (hereinafter "the article of this case") stating that he would have directly engaged in sexual traffic business.

The article of this case is mostly consistent with the contents of the news reports distributed by the Bupyeongdo Federation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to this defense

A. The Defendant asserts that a request for a corrective report based on the Plaintiff’s Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports (hereinafter “Act on Press Arbitration”) is unlawful because the period for filing the lawsuit expires.

B. Article 14(1) of the Press Arbitration Act provides that “Any person who suffers damage from a press report may request a corrective report within three months from the date the relevant press report became aware of.”

When compiling the facts without dispute, the entry of the evidence No. 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings, the following facts or the following circumstances may be acknowledged:

1) On May 7, 2018, K Newspapers reported as the title “L”.

arrow