logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.28 2013고단263
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 27, 2009, Defendant B sentenced one year and two months to imprisonment for special larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and completed the execution of the above punishment on July 14, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 21, 2012, at around 20:30 on December 21, 2012, the Defendants discovered that the said residence came out in the victim E’s residence located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Down-gu 203, and Defendant B classified the front line of the said residence and confirmed that the house was an empty house, and reported the network at the parking lot. Defendant A opened and intrudes the kitchen door of the kitchen which was not corrected by putting up the gas pipe installed on the outer wall of the said residence, and removed the sound kitchen of the kitchen installed on the front door so that the victims and their families do not enter the entrance, and then stolen property equivalent to KRW 20,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

2. On January 4, 2013, the Defendants who attempted to larceny at night were 18:0 or around 19:00 on January 4, 2013, and were in the residence of the victim G of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 201. The Defendants got into the residence of the victim, thereby flying the object into the residence of the victim. Defendant B reported the network on the nearby vehicle; Defendant A intruded into the pents installed in order to control the outside person’s entry into the entrance of the said building; Defendant A loaded into the pents more than two pents, installed in order to control the outside person’s entry; and even though the gate installed on the outer wall of the building opened and carried out the shock net of the victim’s residence, the intention was not achieved because the inner window was corrected.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to steal the victim's property, but did not commit it but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendants]

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. E statements;

1. The report on damage to G:

arrow