The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on January 12, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at Seongdong-gu District Court on September 14, 2016.

1. On September 29, 2016, around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) provided the “E” for the operation of the Victim D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “E”); (b) provided the Victim with alcohol, eye, etc., and provided the Victim with no intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) ordered the Victim with alcohol, eye, etc.; and (d) provided the Victim with an order of alcohol, eye, etc., which is the sum of the market price of KRW 18,200, 200; (b) provided the Victim with 13:20,000, 1 disease, 3 disease, and

2. On September 29, 2016, at around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) provided the “H” of the victim G operation in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) provided the victim with alcohol and alcohol with no intent or ability to pay the price despite being provided with alcohol and alcohol from the victim; (c) ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol; and (d) received the victim with the victim’s 10,000 won in total from the victim, and acquired the victim’s 1 disease, 5 disease, 5 disease, and drinking water, and 130,000 won in the market price and 130,000 won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each police statement made to D and I;

1. Each receipt; and

1. All images of CCTV images and on-site photographs after the closure of the CCTV;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of crimes within the repeated period), judgment documents, and the current status of expropriation of individuals;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act have committed multiple identical crimes, and each of the instant fraud crimes has been committed under the status of repeated crimes.

Damage has not been compensated.

The sentence against the defendant shall be determined for more than one reason.