beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;
2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months with prison labor for the crime of injury, etc. at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court on February 5, 2014, and the Defendant was finally sentenced to a suspended sentence on February 13, 2014.
1. On January 12, 2014, the Defendant in collusion with B, and around 22:30 on January 12, 2014, at E convenience stores managed by the victim D (the 23 years of age), the Defendant and B, under the influence of alcohol, share a franc with each other, drops the goods displayed at the convenience store, drinks alcohol, smoke, and slife while smoking. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s convenience store by force of about 20 minutes, such as junating the victim’s stife, and repeats the display stand.
2. On the same day at around 22:50 of the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant conspired with B to the obstruction of performance of official duties, and at the same place at around 22:50 of the same day, the Defendant and B requested G, a police officer affiliated with the Sungnamnam Police Station F box of the Sungnam Police Station, who was called out after receiving 112 a report that he would avoid disturbance at the convenience store, and H to the Defendant and B, that “I will drink while drinking alcohol within the convenience store, and not be able to smoke, if you are not able to smoke.”
i. Maschipia
D. D. D. B. The Defendant expressed his bath, “W.” The Defendant: “P. L. H. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. B’s b. L. B’s b. L. B’s b. B’s b. B’s b. B’s b. b. c. the Defendant was f.h.’s b.h.’s b. L. H.’s b.h. b. b.h., the Defendant was f.h.’s face and b.h. of L. L. L. L. L. b., and the Defendant was f.h.’s b.h., the Defendant was f., and the Defendant was f.h.’s b. b.h., the Defendant committed assault to the victims, and interfere with the police officer’s 112 reporting and criminal prevention.
Summary of Evidence
1..