logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.03.29 2017구합6338
건강보험료 및 장기요양보험료 징수처분 무효확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff and the selected parties, the relationship between C and C are children between D and E.

D and E shared consultations on August 27, 2010, and thereafter, E and the plaintiffs, the designated parties, and C are not living together.

B. (1) around December 25, 2016, C was employed by F Co., Ltd. and obtained the qualification as an employment provided policyholder for health insurance. On January 19, 2017, the Plaintiff submitted a report on the qualification as a dependent to the Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation to obtain the qualification as a dependent of the Plaintiff and the designated person C. On March 2, 2017, C appears to be disqualified as the above employment provided policyholder. (2) On April 20, 2017, the Plaintiff was employed by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency to obtain the qualification as an employment provided policyholder for health insurance, and the designated person thereafter submitted a report on the qualification as a dependent to the Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation to obtain the qualification as a dependent of the designated person and C.

C. Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation’s notification of non-qualification as a dependent of Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation is acknowledged as having no parent or parents as an unmarried person, and also there is no parent or parents’ remuneration or income. In the case of Plaintiff, Selection, and C, Plaintiff and Selection on the ground that there is business income from the mother E.

Around January 24, 2017, and May 2017, each of the applications described in the paragraph, notified the Plaintiff and the designated parties that they will not be qualified as a dependent. Accordingly, each of the instant dispositions (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant dispositions”) was made.

Plaintiff

In addition, the Plaintiff filed an objection against Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation (hereinafter “C”) with the purport that “from December 25, 2016 to recognize the Plaintiff and the designated parties as the dependent of C,” but the Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation was above March 16, 2017.

arrow