logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2014.02.06 2013가합1812
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 72,539,958 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 23, 2013 to February 6, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running a housing, general building construction, real estate development business, etc., and the Defendant Korea Housing Corporation was merged with the Korea Housing Corporation on October 1, 2009 and became the Defendant. The purpose of this is to contribute to the development of the national economy by promoting the improvement of national housing life and the efficient utilization of land through the acquisition, development, reservation, supply, urban development, maintenance, housing construction, supply, and management of land in question.

B. The land of this case, which is owned by the 1623 Daegu-dong, Seosan-dong (hereinafter “instant land 1”) and the 1624 large 915.6 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land 2”); and the land of this case, which is referred to as the “each of the instant land” as the site for the land owned by the Estysi Center (hereinafter “Stysi Center”), was a gas station site on September 20, 201. The use was abolished around September 20, 2010.

C. Each of the instant lands was designated as a c4-5 general commercial site within the development project area of the Ansan-do Housing Site created by the Defendant for the general commercial land in the development project area of the instant case, which was designated as c4-5.

C4-4 The land 2 of this case was designated as the general commercial site in the development project area of the Ansan Housing Site as C4-4.

In addition, the Defendant entered into a compensation contract for each of the instant lands on the condition that the Sejong Daily Center removed all of the gas station facilities on each of the instant lands, created a site in which the general building can be constructed, and then transferred the site to the Defendant.

1) On January 25, 2011, the Defendant sold the instant land to the New-ro Association. On January 20, 2012, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the New-ro Union concluded a contract on the succession of rights and obligations with the purport that the Plaintiff succeeds to the rights and obligations of the New-ro Association on the said land. 2) On January 31, 201, the Defendant sold the instant land first to the Mapo Association, and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

arrow