The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal reveals that the defendant sent pictures and videos to sexual intercourse immediately before the instant case to the immediately preceding F, and the defendant also actively sought sexual intercourse in consideration of the circumstances in which the defendant and F entered the room of F

In light of the fact that F appears, even though F does not know the first half of the defendant's statement, although F did not know the first half of the defendant's statement, F stated in detail the first half of the defendant's statement, the defendant was in a sexual intercourse under an agreement with F.

It is reasonable to view it.

Nevertheless, the court below pronounced not guilty of the defendant's false accusation, which is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. On September 29, 2015, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case stated to the effect that, for the purpose of having F criminal punishment imposed upon the E District Office in the Suwon-si Police Station E District Office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) the police officer, who belongs to the said police station, attempted to rape the Defendant’s clothes by force; (b) the Defendant, upon resisting the Defendant’s resistance, assaulted the Defendant’s face and body part by drinking and launching, thereby causing bodily injury for two weeks; and (c) the Defendant was punished.

However, as the defendant tried to have a sexual intercourse with F under the agreement with F, but the F was unable to have a sexual intercourse due to F's circumstances, there was a dispute about the victim's head twice, and F did not have been able to have a sexual intercourse with F, and there was no fact that the defendant was able to have a sexual intercourse with F due to an assault from F or an assault from F in the process.

As a result, the defendant made F a false accusation for the purpose of having F punished criminal punishment.

3. The lower court’s judgment: (a) based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant, based on the following circumstances: (b) the police and prosecutor’s office, the Defendant was obvious to have been raped from F; and (c) the Defendant sustained injury

The statement has been made, there is no consistent and contradictory, and the defendant will not dismiss F.