logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.06.21 2011고정1778
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2011 High Court Decision 1778] The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he purchases a household from the victim B.

On December 31, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to deposit money in an online account at the time of delivery to the E Apartment 100,000 won, such as 2 pactules and 1 shocks, within the “D exhibition center” operated by the victim in the two cities of Gyeonggi, which is operated by the victim in the three cities of Gyeonggi, into an online account at the time of delivery as 106 Dong 1402.

The defendant obtained a delivery of the same day household from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

[201st fixed 227] The defendant was a person who worked in F as a fishing big instructor in both countries of the Gyeonggi-do.

1. On October 25, 2010, the Defendant issued a dance certificate to the victim G, stating that “B shall be the president of the Danceblings Association with the authority to issue the Embbbician leader’s license. When granting money in terms of tuition fees and job placement expenses, the Defendant would educate the victim G to comply with Embbbic 3 leader’s license (which would be possible at the time of acquisition to do the Embbbbic fishing lessons) and the Embbbbic 1 leader’s license (which would be possible to do the Embbbbbbic fishing lessons at the time of acquisition), and would issue a dance certificate to the Dammer Association. After issuing a Embbic license, the Defendant stated that “F would be employed as the Embbbbbic instructor affiliated with the Embre Mem.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was in a situation where it is economically difficult for him to operate only one instructor with him, because he was not a large number of students in the operation of the above Banx Center, and the above 'dancemera Association' is not an existing association, but merely prepared for the organization of the Defendant. Therefore, even if the Defendant received money from the victim as the fee for the issuance of the ebbbbbbic qualification certificate and the fee for the employment of the Ebbbbic instructor, the Defendant would have the victim issued the ebbbbbbbic qualification certificate to the victim, or the victim would be employed at the above center in the operation of the Defendant.

arrow