logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.11 2017누42400
토지 보상금 증액 등 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the Plaintiff’s claim is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the statement of evidence No. 15, the judgment of the court of first instance accepting part of the Plaintiff’s claim is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is as follows: Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act recognize “F” as “G”, except where “F” as “G” under Section 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow