Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall gambling using any act of offering property or property benefits to persons who win the result of sports promotion by issuing voting rights or a similar things to the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation or a person who is not an entrusted business entity.

Nevertheless, on May 10, 201, the Defendant joined the Defendant’s house located in Ssung-gun, Gosung-gun, by using a computer, and deposited KRW 10,000 in a company bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant’s agricultural bank account designated by the said gambling site operator in the name of the Defendant, and deposited KRW 10,000 in the name of the Defendant’s agricultural bank account in the name of the F, which was designated by the said gambling site, and used for gambling in a game that predicted the winning or winning of the sports games, such as a axis opened at home and abroad, and as indicated in the attached list of crimes, from that time to March 21, 2017, by depositing KRW 846,149,900 in total over 2,968.

As a result, the Defendant used the act of providing property or property benefits to those who win the result by issuing sports promotion voting rights or similar things to the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation and a person who is not an entrusted business entity.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the details of deposits into and out of accounts under suspect title);

1. Article 48 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 48 subparagraph 3 and 26 (1) of the Act on the Promotion of National Sports for the Selection of Punishment (in all cases, selection of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are not much relevant to the gambling of this case is disadvantageous.

However, in order for the defendant to retire from gambling, the defendant himself/herself will clarify the crime of gambling of this case and actively engage in the investigation.