logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.04.16 2020고단634
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 from the Suwon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. Although the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting drunk driving as above, at around 02:50 on November 28, 2019, the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting drunk driving by driving a bcoon in the direction of approximately 1 to 0.160% of the blood alcohol level from the first place located near the top one-way of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si to the center of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, to the front road, while driving a bcoon with approximately 1 to 2km with the alcohol level of about 0.160%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving a car in B co.

At around 02:50 on November 28, 2019, the Defendant, as stated in Paragraph 1, 2019, driven the said car in a state that it is difficult to drive the car normally, such as the horse rhythm, and the body string distance, was driven by the Defendant, while driving the said car at the center of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and driving the front road along the front road of the Seocho-gu, which is located along the center of the Nansan-si, along the speed of about 60-70km from the direction of the direction of the city.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving duties of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front section and the left and right, and to accurately manipulate the steering gear and the brakes so as to prevent the accident from occurring.

The Defendant neglected to drive a car while driving, and neglected to do so, caused the shock prevention facility installed at the front section of the said vehicle at the front section of the said vehicle by negligence, and caused the said vehicle to be restored to the right side of the said vehicle on the road.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the right spawn salt, etc., to the victim C (Nam, 20 years of age) who was on board his own car with the foregoing occupational negligence for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

arrow