Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and half years and fine of one million won, Defendant B with fines of four million won, and Defendant C with fines of 1.5 million won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 1991, F, the premise of the premise, set up a “D Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter “D”) for the extraction and sale of aggregate from the G of the elderly group in North Korea.

From September 2009, F obtained permission to extract aggregate in the name of Defendant A and Dong business, and divided profits accrued therefrom while selling aggregate. At the time of 2015, the area where permission to extract aggregate was granted under the name of “D” is 4,850 square meters prior to H of the Gyeongbuk-gun, the area where permission to extract aggregate was granted is 4,417 square meters prior to four parcels, including Defendant A and Dong business.

Defendant

B accepted the proposal that “D” was to be operated after the F died on December 2014, and at this time, the Defendant A accepted the proposal that “J aggregate projects undertaken in D because I have returned to her home,” which was “the same as the J aggregate projects undertaken in D.”

Defendant

B entrusts Defendant A with the supervision and management of the above H aggregate extraction site, and he mainly performed the work such as collecting aggregate at the site of Lone aggregate storage site in the Gu, Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun M and N.

Defendant

A, on January 2015, 2015, after collecting aggregate from the area for which the permission to extract aggregate was obtained from the above H, the Defendant B started to extract aggregate from the Haman on February 2, 2015 to the remaining area of 5,385 square meters not permitted from the above H, and became aware of it later, the Defendant B, along with the Defendant A, extracted aggregate from the area for which the said H’s permission was not obtained.

Defendant

A around May 2015, following the completion of the aggregate extraction work at the above H, Defendant B would no longer act with his own business. As seen above, A had the intent to threaten the relevant agency to file a complaint against Defendant B, a substantial operator of D’s “D”, by taking advantage of the fact that the aggregate was illegally extracted under his/her own initiative, and by threatening the relevant agency to bring about a threat.

2. Criminal facts "2018 Highest 1853".

A. The victim B is the victim B 3.