logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.08.22 2018고단1928
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on May 15, 2008, and on December 21, 2012, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two times or more by receiving a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Seoul East East District Court for the same crime.

On March 29, 2018, the Defendant driven a C-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-A-A-U-A-A-U-A-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-U-A-A-A-U

On May 15, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Jung-gu District Court around May 15, 2008. On December 21, 2012, the Seoul East District Court received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of the same offense, and there was two times the record of violation of the prohibition of drinking regulations, such as receiving a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Seoul East District Court on December 21, 2012. On May 24, 2018, the Defendant was charged with the same offense to the Jung-gu District Court on May 24, 2018 and was currently detained for the same offense, and refers to the case of the

is the same.

On May 23, 2018, around 01:30, the Defendant driven Cenz S350-d motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.078% in the section of approximately 100 meters from the center of the city to the center of the 57-ro Do-ro 57 in each city, Namyang-si. to the center of the same city.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 1928]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written response to a request for appraisal;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (verification of such type of force);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Temporary driver's license;

1. A previous conviction: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, reporting of a previous conviction before and after the disposition, and the application of a copy of the indictment;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment

arrow