The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, and in depth reflects the depth, and appears to have caused the instant crimes due to the aggravation of the management of the maintenance plant operated.

However, even though the defendant has been sentenced 6 times to a fine due to a violation of the Labor Standards Act, and 2 times to a punishment due to a fraud, she has committed each of the crimes in this case.

Although there are many victims, the total amount of unpaid wages is KRW 1482,00,000, and the amount acquired by deception from the suppliers of automobile parts exceeds KRW 53,00,000, it was not agreed with the victims up to the trial, and there was no substantial damage reimbursement.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(In the second sentence of the judgment of the court below, the "2013" in the first sentence of Article 2-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code is clear that it is a clerical error in the "2012", and thus, it is corrected ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the