logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.11 2019고정186
주택법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2017, the Defendant violated the Housing Act: (a) around the parking lot adjacent to the bank located in Osan-si B, the Defendant issued C a house subscription passbook, identification card, certificate of personal seal impression, and an authorized certificate, to C necessary documents for subscription for new shares; and (b) received KRW 7 million from C for the consideration thereof.

On June 1, 2017, C, which received the foregoing documents from the Defendant, applied for a house subscription for the special supply of the new mixed part of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment under the name of the Defendant, and sold the said apartment E.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the certificate of the occupants' savings or its status in order to have the housing constructed and supplied in accordance with the Housing Act or to have the housing supplied, and provided the housing constructed and supplied in accordance with the Housing Act by fraud or other improper means.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act when transferring his identification card and a certificate of personal seal impression to C as above, he heard the horses that “as he intends to subscribe for a house, he is preferentially supplied to residents residing in the area where the relevant house is located as of the date of the public announcement of the invitation of occupants, and thus, he must move his resident registration to the area where the public announcement of the invitation of occupants is made,” and tried to move

Accordingly, the Defendant issued an authorized certificate necessary for the move-in report to C, and caused C to access C to the Internet “24 City Civil Petitions” website by using the Defendant’s authorized certificate on May 18, 2017, and caused C to make a move-in report as if the Defendant did not change his residence to Seoul Mapo-gu F and G, even though he did not change his residence to the said domicile.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to report false facts on resident registration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1.Each.

arrow