The case holding that a knife knife, knife, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

The case holding that a knife knife knife consisting of knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife n

Article 2 (2) of the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, etc. Act, Article 4 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act

Defendant 1 and one other

Prosecutor

Attorney Kim Jong-chul

Gwangju High Court Decision 93No54 delivered on April 30, 1993

The appeal is dismissed.

1. Prosecutor’s ground of appeal No. 1

The court below rejected the evidence that corresponds to each of the facts charged of rape and bodily injury from rape of Defendant 1 and each of the facts charged of special rape, special robbery, and rape of Defendant 2, and rendered a judgment not guilty, and judged that there is no evidence of crime. The judgment of the court below is just and it cannot be viewed that there is an error in the rules of evidence against the rules of evidence, such as the theory of the court below, and it cannot be viewed that there is no error in the rules of evidence against the rules of evidence, such as the selection of evidence and the fact-finding of the court below. Ultimately,

2. Determination on the ground of appeal No. 2

The court below determined that the knives and knives and knives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives and kives.

In light of relevant evidence and records and the provisions of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, the above recognition judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and the judgment of the court below does not contain any error of law by misunderstanding legal principles as to the scope of swords as prescribed by the above Act, such as the theory of lawsuit, and therefore there is no reason to discuss

3. Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal shall be dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Yoon-young (Presiding Justice)