1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 14, 1986, the Plaintiff completed a marriage report with C on February 14, 1986 and has two children.

C From November 2001, Korea has operated only one Council member in Young-gun, Jeonnam-gun, and has been enrolled in Seoul where both the Plaintiff and ASEAN reside at the weekend.

B. At around 2008, the Defendant came to know of the fact that he was the director of the E Museum located D (hereinafter “E Museum”) and the F Museum located in the Hasan-si, and came to know of the fact that C was under one-way medical treatment. After that, C was in charge of the chairman of the E Museum at the Defendant’s request, C maintained the relationship of friendship with each other.

C. On May 6, 2013, C transferred Korea Won to another National Assembly member, and subsequently changed Korea National Assembly member from Ansan-si to “Ghanwon.” At the request of C, the Defendant attempted to test Korea National Assembly member.

On May 2, 2013, the Plaintiff became aware of the fact that the Defendant intended to help Han Council members to grant a license for the extension of the term “A”, and C did not enter the house where the Plaintiff and ASEAN reside in Han Council room near the Han Council members since that time.

E. On May 26, 2013, C began to discuss each other’s divorce by sending the divorce agreement to the Plaintiff by e-mail, and on October 29, 2013, C again sent the Plaintiff the conditions of divorce by e-mail.

F. Meanwhile, on November 10, 2013, the Plaintiff was aware of C’s misconduct, and frighted with H, a nurse, who works together in Gangnam-gu Seoul, with C, to wear his/her son and walked with each other. On December 28, 2013, the Plaintiff testified that C sleeped at H’s house and slicked with his/her body.

G. On January 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against H for damages on the ground of an unlawful act (U.S. District Court Decision 2014Da100245), and on January 30, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the judgment that “H shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 4,00,000,000 and damages for delay.”

H. H.