logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.07.10 2018고단4011
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and by a fine of two thousand won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 4011] (Defendant A, B, C, and D) Defendant A operated the “G” Council member on the second floor of the Seoul Central Western-gu F and the second floor. From April 21, 2017, Defendant A established the “H Council member” in one half of the internal space of the said Council member and operated the “G” Council member and the “H Council member” concurrently. Defendant B is the head of the counseling office for consultation with the “G” Council members and the “H” Council members while managing the Auction Council members. Defendant C is employed by Defendant A from around April 21, 2017 to work as a H Council member and Defendant D works as a staff member of the “H” Council, and Defendant D works as a staff member of the company under the supervision of “G” and takes charge of the duties of the “H” council members after the establishment of the “H” Council member.

1. Violation of the Special Act on Insurance Fraud Prevention;

A. In order to increase the sales of one source of “G”, Defendant A, and Party B conspired with Party B to make up for the total amount of the cost of the medical treatment by soliciting the patients insured by the loss to be compensated for the total amount of the cost of the medical treatment by the loss insurance among the patients who find one source after setting up one million won or two million won of the successful bid and the marina (theme) at ten times or twenty times of the price of the medical treatment. In order to make the patients to be compensated for the total amount of the cost of the medical treatment from the loss insurance, the patients conspired with Party B to make false medical treatment as if they had received the medical treatment from the “J Council member” of both States I and II operated by Party E and to receive the amount of the loss insurance from the State insurance company.

Accordingly, on October 31, 2016, Defendant B provided guidance to enable L to claim for compensation for loss even if he/she is awarded a successful bid or theme, and Defendant B provided a consultation with L who has been recruited through G "G" through "G" by having L settle the said package with 2 million won, and then consulted with L who has been paid a successful bid or theme to L who has been awarded a contract for compensation for loss. Defendant B provided a successful bid or theme to L on November 2016.

arrow