The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Sexual assault for 40 hours against the Defendants.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants (the imprisonment of 10 months, the suspension of execution of 2 years, the observation of protection, and the community service order of 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

B. Each of the above forms of the lower court’s judgment is deemed to be too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflect their mistakes, and the fact that the defendants can be repeated as a sound member of society in accordance with their intent and efforts to improve and endeavor in the future as young people of the 20th mid-term group can be considered as positive sentencing factors.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendants at D and her mother, a female juvenile under the age of 15, who was released by the Defendants, and was fluencing the men wishing to have sexual intercourse through smartphone-rating display, and arranged them to be the counterpart of sexual traffic seven times through D. The Defendants did not respect D, a juvenile released by the Defendants, as a sound personality body, but as a tool for economic pursuit, and most of the profits acquired during that process were consumed by the Defendants.

fully 15 years of age;

D seems to have suffered a lot of sexual humiliation and physical or mental suffering due to the defendants' crimes.

In order for the defendants to attract the social awareness about the illegality and danger of the act of sexual traffic by arranging sexual traffic using mobile phone display cases, it is highly likely that the juveniles are engaged in sexual traffic continuously rather than merely once sexual traffic, and the illegality and criticism of the act of sexual traffic are highly likely to be committed.

In addition, the Defendants did not improve their character and conduct even though they had already been given an opportunity for correction with multiple times due to special larcenys, etc., and did not improve their character and conduct.