Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 as of February 2, 200, the Defendants heard the horses that Defendant A, the president of the Commercial Building World of the said building E, would be legally resolved from the victim while harming the issue of embezzlement of public funds in the commercial building held in the above E building, and Defendant A, the president of the commercial building 52 years old, was able to look at the victim’s right face at the victim’s breath, and was able to take the victim’s breath by taking the breath of the victim’s breath and breath by taking the victim’s breath and breath by taking the victim’s breath, and Defendant B used the victim’s bat at two times in combination with the breath of the victim’s head by taking the breath of the victim’s bat.

Since then, the victim was born to "G" store in the first floor of the above building, and the defendant B entered the above store according to the victim, and her hand flabed with the victim's flab, and used the victim's flab by taking the victim's flab.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first trial record;

1. The statements of witnesses F and H in the third protocol of the trial;

1. The statements made by witnesses I and J in the fourth trial records;

1. Some statements in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution against K;

1. Some statements in the prosecutor's statement concerning L;

1. Investigation report (09-75451, copy of statement);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (L)

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the punishment of crimes;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A and their defense counsel did not commit any assault against the victim as stated in the judgment of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and there was no fact of conspiracy with Defendant B.