Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2010, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the resolution of the representative meeting of Seoul Central District Court 2010 Gohap28654, which was raised by seven persons, including C, in the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 458, the civil Dong Office 458, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 2010, as the witness of the D major meeting (the representative E) with the purport of the purport of "the resolution elected by the closing meeting as the closing chairperson at the representative meeting on March 26, 2009 shall be confirmed that the resolution is null and void," and the Defendant's agent stated that "the amount paid by the witness to E is five copies of the check issued at the branch office of Korea on December 31, 208 as the witness's check number of 1,00,000 won," and the witness's agent's reply to the witness's "50,000 won E."

However, the defendant did not issue five copies of the 1,000,000 won check to E at the above time.

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol of examination of witness;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouse, and the defendant's statement constitutes perjury because the defendant's statement does not go against memory.