logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.04.03 2015고정220
경범죄처벌법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) found in the new district unit of the new police station in the Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Police Station, and (b) took place in the crime of interference with business on the day immediately before the crime of interference with business, and was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance while under the influence of alcohol for about 20 minutes while taking a bath.

On November 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:50 on November 22, 2014, the 2015 High Court Decision 2015Da5221, the Defendant: (b) stated that, under the influence of drinking and drinking alcohol, the Defendant: (c) was able to see the victim’s 5 minutes of disturbance in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C(37 years of age) located in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance between about 25 minutes of disturbance, including: (d) why the police would not take place; and (d) why it would not take place.

around 13:50 on December 12, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s normal restaurant business for about 30 minutes, such as drinking mixed alcohol and drinking tobacco in the G restaurant located in Daegu-gu, which is operated by the Victim E (33 years of age) and drinking tobacco, and having the Defendant and the Plaintiff talked with telephone communications, etc., thereby obstructing the victim’s business.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendant, from around 14:40 to around 15:00 on the same day, was under the influence of alcohol in the “I” located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and made a request to the victim J who was engaged in sales of mobile phones to build his/her cell phone and send his/her phone instead of letters to the wife.

Accordingly, the victim sent letters to the defendant's cell phone with the word "Ilri" or "Ilri" and asked the victim to send letters directly to the defendant, and rejected the defendant's cell phone.

The Defendant is divided into two parts.

arrow