A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Height131]

1. On August 8, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim D who has an impediment to fluoral disease in his/her own residence located in Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun C, for the purpose of medical care, the Defendant purchased cargo vehicles from Solomon Savings Bank to the effect that “A defect in fluoral funeral services, such as the purchase of the fluoral vehicles, shall be performed.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to carry out funeral services even if he received the above loan, and there was no intention or ability to repay it.

On August 10, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, charged the victim with the obligation to pay an amount equivalent to KRW 6 million, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 6 million by transferring the amount to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of Defendant Dong Dong E to the said account.

2. On December 12, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D at the above place to the effect that “If the Defendant borrowed KRW 7 million from the Hyundai Swiss Savings Bank due to the need for living expenses, it would be repaid upon the maturity of the lending period.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay even if the victim borrowed the above loan to the defendant.

On December 12, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 7 million from the victim as the borrowed money.

3. On October 12, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, who is the father of D, to the effect that “In order to repay KRW 50 million for the lease deposit borrowed from G, the Defendant may collect the loan from G, because he/she could cancel the collateral security that was established on his/her own real estate, and thus, lend the termination cost of the collateral security.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed.

On October 12, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.2 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant.