1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the respondent is revoked, and all the plaintiff's claims corresponding to the revoked part are asserted.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The plaintiff (GG) has been engaged in the sale of medical appliances as a person with the ability to live on the left-hand side.

B. The Plaintiff suffered from a traffic accident that conflicts with the truck during driving around September 2012, and received “the left sloping sloping, the left sloping sloping sloping, the left sloping sloping sloping, the left sloping sloping sloping sloping at the center of the original resident.” The Plaintiff received hospital treatment for one month as to the upper sloping sloping sloping sloping on the left sloping sloping and the left sloping sloping sloping sloping sloping sloping on the left sloping sloping sloping sloping, etc., and received rehabilitation treatment for about eight months by transferring it to the H regularly.

C. On August 2, 2013, the Plaintiff was from the doctor F of the original Synish Hospital at the National University of Generation on August 2, 2013:

(b) was diagnosed of the disability by the fact that the underground disability (10% of the payment rate) remains permanently on the left side of the accident described in paragraph (d).

The Plaintiff was diagnosed with a high blood pressure cryposis at the sypiana hospital at the sypiana Hospital around July 2013, and was hospitalized for approximately three months at the above hospital.

E. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the original filial health care hospital operated by the Defendant under the name of sick person, such as “the influenites, the following legs, the recovery after the treatment of the bend, and the heart of high blood pressure,” etc., from November 9, 2013 to May 7, 2014.

F. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in B Hospital on May 7, 2014

5.8. 8. The term “the pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pel

5. A person was hospitalized until 29.

G. On May 29, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred the hospital to the hospital with the original efficacy, which received rehabilitation treatment.

【Fact-finding without dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 (including the number of branches; hereinafter the same shall apply), the fact-finding results with respect to the original family school of this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether or not the Plaintiff is liable for damages is beyond the shower room in the original home care hospital.