logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.12 2017고단2832
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on March 16, 2017, the Defendant: (b) determined the crackdown police officers and the place of gender-related commitments, as KRW 150,000,000,000, who pretended to purchase sex; and (c) decided 1.50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of the recommended punishment in accordance with the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court [type]; the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be six months to one year and four months; and

2. Determination of a sentence of sexual traffic is an act of arranging sexual traffic and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals by making the sex commercialized, and thus requires strict punishment, and the crime of this case is committed after being sentenced to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime and several months, which is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, considering the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than the suspension of execution, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment above the suspension of execution, and the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case, such as the business period, scale, type of business, profits earned from sexual traffic intermediation, etc., the sentence like the order shall

arrow