A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

No. 49 of seized evidence No. 53,54 shall be charged to the victim's name or not.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On February 6, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in the Incheon District Court’s Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 14, 2015, and is currently under probation, and was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 27, 2015.

[Defendant’s event room] around 20:00 on May 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the farm in the Yacheon-gu, Seoul Olympic District located in 702, the Yacheon-gu, Seoul Olympic Winter Games; (b) at the gallon city, the victim D’s market value of which is equivalent to KRW 500,00,000, a mobile phone base, library member cards, student cards, and cash 3,000, and stolen property worth KRW 50,000, a total of 111 times from around that time until July 22, 2015, the market value of the victims, which was habitually owned by the victims, was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, H, I, D, J, K, L, and M;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Reports on occurrence of each case and reports on internal investigation (the telephone conversations, etc. with the victim N);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the theft criminal records, the number of crimes, the number of crimes and the number of crimes committed in a short period of time in the judgment;

1. Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act, comprehensively including relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 333(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the return of victims: The crime of this case was committed without being aware of during the period of probation, and the crime of this case was committed repeatedly over 11 times within the short period remaining for 2 months, and the nature of the crime was serious, and there was no agreement with the victims, and other favorable circumstances: The defendant appears to be against the defendant's wrong judgment, and there was no criminal conviction before it reaches the same kind of punishment.