Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from March 31, 2015 to September 15, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 13, 2013, the Plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed a marriage report on September 13, 2013, and maintains the current marital relationship by giving birth to children around April 2014.
B. The Defendant and C were first in high school, who met at the time, or who met with his son at the time, and was in contact with his son at the time. However, around April 2013, the contact came to be tightly exchanged from the drinking house located in the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power plant and the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power plant at the nuclear power
C. On August 22, 2014, C made a false statement to the Plaintiff that he/she would make a business trip in Seoul, and thereafter, C, along with the Defendant, made a one-stop-ro in the East Sea, and returned to the original state on August 23, 2014.
On August 25, 2014, the Defendant sent a Kakakao Stockholm message to C, which read that the Defendant and C should not communicate with the Defendant. After finding out the above Kakakao Stockholm message, the Plaintiff sent the phone to the Defendant, and then, the Defendant sent the phone to the Defendant, and the Defendant saying, “I would know why I would see that I would see that I would be in connection with C because I would not contact with the Defendant. I think that I would see that I would be in connection with the Defendant and C at the time.”
E. However, around October 2014, the Plaintiff knew that C’s use of the credit card was not between C and C’s business trip on August 22, 2014, and that C left the sea with the Defendant, and that C left the sea with the Defendant. The Plaintiff, upon finding the clothing sales store operated by the Defendant on October 23, 2014, divided the conversation with the Defendant, such as the statement in the [Attachment] statement.”
F. Meanwhile, between March 1, 2014 and March 5, 2015, the Defendant made a phone call to C in a white time.
G. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant joined the Kakaoton Association, which was a member of the first police officer C, and at the time before and after the filing of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant “the Kakao Stockholm message” was attached to C.