Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff entered into a truck mutual-aid agreement with the ATrack Track Truck (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) which is owned by the said company.
B. Around 14:00 on December 11, 2015, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle B: (a) was driving the said vehicle within the steel 2R-1 workplace of the Defendant East International Institute Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant East International Institute”), the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s vehicle’s load onto the front part of the vehicle, and gave an instruction to the upper part of the vehicle and sent a water signal at the same site; (b) around 14:10 on the same day, C died by a low blood tension shock tank caused by chest pressure.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
At the time of the instant accident, C, the Deceased, sent the Plaintiff’s vehicle to D, which is located in the direction of the front line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and sent the Plaintiff’s vehicle back to the front line in order to carry out the front and rear auxiliary work, and D, who was a driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, sent the sign to the Plaintiff’s vehicle back, and D, who was a driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, sent the sign again to B, in accordance with the number of signals sent by D.
However, when the deceased accessed the above vehicle to the extent of 1m, D sent a hand signal to stop the vehicle by means of drinking flapsing, and D sent a hand signal to B to stop the vehicle in the same manner. However, B continued, the deceased died because it was between the plaintiff's vehicle and the steel flaps.
According to the above mutual aid agreement, the Plaintiff paid the deceased’s bereaved family members a sum of KRW 230,364,150 (i.e., KRW 230,000,000 for the agreed amount of KRW 364,150).
[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, witness B's testimony and pleading.