logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.20 2016나21393
배당이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: Article 3-B(2)(5) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance added "Evidence Nos. 14 and 15 of the plaintiff's additional documents (Evidence No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance is merely a confirmation document prepared by the former lessee, and Article 15 of the text message No. 15 of the judgment No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance is not sufficient, but it is insufficient to view that the lessor D consented or approved the sub-lease contract itself between the plaintiff and the plaintiff.

In addition to applying the fifth “3. conclusion” as “4. conclusion,” it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow