logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.12 2016고정2497
입찰방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

As the trade name of “D” in Daegu Northern-gu C, and in supplying food materials to public institutions such as schools in the area of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, with the trade name of “G”, the Defendant is a person who supplies school meal materials by participating in an electronic bid for group meal service purchase contracts and being awarded a contract by participating in a group food supply contract and being awarded a contract.

The defendant, in collusion with E, established a disguised G under the name of E, as if he was a competitor, due to an increase in the number of competitive enterprises participating in group meals electronic tendering such as schools, and established a disguised G under the name of E, and actually, the defendant managed and operated it at the same time, thereby increasing the probability of successful bidding.

Therefore, in participating in the electronic tendering system (G2B) of the country where the procurement agency (G2B) provides a notice on the submission of a small estimate of the number of subsidiary foods (agricultural, fishery, and industrial products) for school meal in August 3, 2015 at a place where it is impossible to identify the place of light on August 3, 2015, the Defendant submitted a report to KRW 17:27,450,000 on the same day in the name of D, and the same month in the name of G established under a disguised title under the name of E.

7. 13:46 At the same time, a school meal supply contract of KRW 2.257 million was awarded in 1,685,000,000,000 from that time, as shown in the list of offenses (D - the details of simultaneous bidding) attached to the attached Table (D - the details of simultaneous bidding) by July 19, 2016.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with E to establish a disguised enterprise, and conducted a fair electronic bid by means of fraudulent means such as simultaneous bidding of school meals electronic bidding.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (at the third public trial date);

arrow